Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMarcucci, Nicola
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-20T12:33:39Z
dc.date.available2024-12-20T12:33:39Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifierONIX_20241220_9791221503197_172
dc.identifier.issn2704-5919
dc.identifier.urihttps://0-library-oapen-org.catalogue.libraries.london.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12657/96377
dc.languageItalian
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStudi e saggi
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NH History::NHB General and world history
dc.subject.otherpolitical authority
dc.subject.otheranomic and coecercive division of labor
dc.subject.otherprofessional groups
dc.subject.otherpersonhood
dc.subject.othersocialism
dc.titleChapter Émile Durkheim: il lavoro dell’ideale
dc.typechapter
oapen.abstract.otherlanguageTo grasp the originality of Durkheimian reflection on labor, it is important to emphasize how it revolves around two substantive aspects: professional groups, understood as the locus of the social reorganization of labor; and the person, understood as the modern ideal whose content is defined in light of the transformation of the contractual institution. This twofold reflection on labor, results in a sociological critique of what Durkheim qualifies as the two main pathological forms of the modern division of labor: the "anomic division" and the "coercive division" of labor. Preliminarily, in order to better situate the reasons for the centrality of both of these aspects, and to better identify the critical aim of Durkheim's sociology, it seems important to understand his reflection on the transformations of power in modern societies and the consequences this reflection has on his conception of the State.
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/979-12-215-0319-7.83
oapen.relation.isPublishedBybf65d21a-78e5-4ba2-983a-dbfa90962870
oapen.relation.isbn9791221503197
oapen.series.number257
oapen.pages9
oapen.place.publicationFlorence


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record