Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorIrigoin, Alejandra
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-20T12:36:10Z
dc.date.available2024-12-20T12:36:10Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifierONIX_20241220_9791221503470_228
dc.identifier.issn2975-1195
dc.identifier.urihttps://0-library-oapen-org.catalogue.libraries.london.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12657/96433
dc.description.abstractBy specifying the specie on which returns were to be repaid respondentia was an efficient instrument to carry trade in which silver was «essential» for the continuation of commerce. As silver was imported as specie, where a multiplicity of means of payments existed and silver was the preferred money, it performed as foreign currency. Without common standards for foreign coins created issues for trade, the pricing of specie, and exchange rates. Eighteenth century Europeans alternatively used respondentia or bills depending on the monetary context, casting a doubt on the inherent efficiency of a cashless means of payment. Bills of exchange did not circulate outside Europe where cash had a premium. As the intermediary Europe developed means to regulate the price of foreign coins and exchange rates. Elsewhere respondentia had an advantage over bills; it allowed to hedge against uncertainty and propitiated arbitrage profits.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDatini Studies in Economic History
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::K Economics, Finance, Business and Management::KC Economics::KCZ Economic history
dc.subject.otherRespondentia
dc.subject.otherPrivate trade finance
dc.titleChapter Respondentia: The alternative contract for global trade finance in the Early Modern period
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/979-12-215-0347-0.30
oapen.relation.isPublishedBybf65d21a-78e5-4ba2-983a-dbfa90962870
oapen.relation.isbn9791221503470
oapen.series.number4
oapen.pages26
oapen.place.publicationFlorence


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record