Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPongratz, Stephan
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-20T12:41:26Z
dc.date.available2024-12-20T12:41:26Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifierONIX_20241220_9791221504033_344
dc.identifier.issn2704-6079
dc.identifier.urihttps://0-library-oapen-org.catalogue.libraries.london.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12657/96550
dc.languageGerman
dc.relation.ispartofseriesReti Medievali E-Book
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NH History::NHB General and world history
dc.subject.otherMiddle Ages
dc.subject.other11th-12th centuries
dc.subject.otherRome
dc.subject.otherhistoriography
dc.subject.otherpapal history
dc.subject.otherschism
dc.subject.otherPope Alexander III
dc.subject.otherpopes and emperors
dc.subject.otherChristianity
dc.subject.othercardinals
dc.subject.otherLiber pontificalis
dc.titleChapter Selbstbehauptung durch Traditionsbildung? Zwei Fortsetzer des Liber pontificalis in den Schismen des 12. Jahrhunderts
dc.typechapter
oapen.abstract.otherlanguageThe Vitae of various popes written by Pandulf and Boso, two of the most important sources on papal history of the 12th century, share a decisive commonality in their connection to the older Liber pontificalis. If one compares both authors in their role as continuators of the papal book, the parallels but also differences in their conceptions of history emerge with new clarity. While Boso, in optimistic trust in God, tried to interweave a golden past with a triumphant future, Pandulf openly addressed the failures and disasters of recent pontificates. His work appears in this light as a memorial of the decline experienced by Anaclet II’s curia.
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/979-12-215-0403-3.15
oapen.relation.isPublishedBybf65d21a-78e5-4ba2-983a-dbfa90962870
oapen.relation.isbn9791221504033
oapen.series.number47
oapen.pages17
oapen.place.publicationFlorence


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record