The Ming Dynasty
Its Origins and Evolving Institutions
dc.contributor.author | Hucker, Charles O. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-09-23T15:16:10Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-09-23T15:16:10Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.identifier | ONIX_20200923_9780472901531_27 | |
dc.identifier | OCN: 1184508703 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://0-library-oapen-org.catalogue.libraries.london.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12657/41831 | |
dc.description.abstract | In the latter half of the fourteenth century, at one end of the Eurasian continent, the stage was not yet set for the emergence of modern nation-states. At the other end, the Chinese drove out their Mongol overlords, inaugurated a new native dynasty called Ming (1368–1644), and reasserted the mastery of their national destiny. It was a dramatic era of change, the full significance of which can only be perceived retrospectively. With the establishment of the Ming dynasty, a major historical tension rose into prominence between more absolutist and less absolutist modes of rulership. This produced a distinctive style of rule that modern students have come to call Ming despotism. It proved a capriciously absolutist pattern for Chinese government into our own time. [1, 2 ,3] | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Michigan Monographs In Chinese Studies | |
dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NH History | en_US |
dc.subject.other | History | |
dc.title | The Ming Dynasty | |
dc.title.alternative | Its Origins and Evolving Institutions | |
dc.type | book | |
oapen.identifier.doi | 10.3998/mpub.19982 | |
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy | e07ce9b5-7a46-4096-8f0c-bc1920e3d889 | |
oapen.relation.isFundedBy | 0314e571-4102-4526-b014-3ed8f2d6750a | |
oapen.relation.isFundedBy | 0cdc3d7c-5c59-49ed-9dba-ad641acd8fd1 | |
oapen.imprint | U OF M CENTER FOR CHINESE STUDIES | |
oapen.series.number | 34 | |
oapen.pages | 119 | |
oapen.place.publication | Ann Arbor | |
oapen.grant.number | [grantnumber unknown] | |
oapen.grant.number | [grantnumber unknown] | |
peerreview.anonymity | Double-anonymised | |
peerreview.id | d98bf225-990a-4ac4-acf4-fd7bf0dfb00c | |
peerreview.open.review | No | |
peerreview.publish.responsibility | Scientific or Editorial Board | |
peerreview.review.decision | Yes | |
peerreview.review.stage | Pre-publication | |
peerreview.review.type | Full text | |
peerreview.reviewer.type | External peer reviewer | |
oapen.review.comments | The proposal was selected by the acquisitions editor who invited a full manuscript. The full manuscript was reviewed by two external readers using a double-blind process. Based on the acquisitions editor recommendation, the external reviews, and their own analysis, the Executive Committee (Editorial Board) of U-M Press approved the project for publication. |