Law and Kingship in Thailand During the Reign of King Chulalongkorn
dc.contributor.author | Engel, David | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-09-23T15:21:38Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-09-23T15:21:38Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.identifier | ONIX_20200923_9780472901944_64 | |
dc.identifier | OCN: 1184510304 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://0-library-oapen-org.catalogue.libraries.london.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12657/41868 | |
dc.description.abstract | This essay originated in an attempt to bring together the study of law and Thai history in a description of the transformation of Thailand during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries as seen from a legal point of view. The resulting work is based for the most part upon those royal enactments from 1873 to 1910 which seemed most crucially to affect the executive, legislative, and judicial functions of the king and the rights of private citizens. [ix] | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Michigan Papers On South And Southeast Asia | |
dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JH Sociology and anthropology | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Sociology and anthropology | |
dc.title | Law and Kingship in Thailand During the Reign of King Chulalongkorn | |
dc.type | book | |
oapen.identifier.doi | 10.3998/mpub.11903383 | |
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy | e07ce9b5-7a46-4096-8f0c-bc1920e3d889 | |
oapen.relation.isFundedBy | 0314e571-4102-4526-b014-3ed8f2d6750a | |
oapen.relation.isFundedBy | 0cdc3d7c-5c59-49ed-9dba-ad641acd8fd1 | |
oapen.imprint | U OF M CENTER FOR SOUTH EAST ASIAN STUDI | |
oapen.pages | 145 | |
oapen.place.publication | Ann Arbor | |
oapen.grant.number | [grantnumber unknown] | |
oapen.grant.number | [grantnumber unknown] | |
peerreview.anonymity | Double-anonymised | |
peerreview.id | d98bf225-990a-4ac4-acf4-fd7bf0dfb00c | |
peerreview.open.review | No | |
peerreview.publish.responsibility | Scientific or Editorial Board | |
peerreview.review.decision | Yes | |
peerreview.review.stage | Pre-publication | |
peerreview.review.type | Full text | |
peerreview.reviewer.type | External peer reviewer | |
oapen.review.comments | The proposal was selected by the acquisitions editor who invited a full manuscript. The full manuscript was reviewed by two external readers using a double-blind process. Based on the acquisitions editor recommendation, the external reviews, and their own analysis, the Executive Committee (Editorial Board) of U-M Press approved the project for publication. |