Show simple item record

dc.contributor.editorRoitman, Malin
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-02T14:56:36Z
dc.date.available2023-05-02T14:56:36Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttps://0-library-oapen-org.catalogue.libraries.london.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12657/62901
dc.description.abstractThis volume deals with the pragmatic dimension of negations and is oriented towards empirical studies of negatives’ meanings and functions in media and public discourses. Negation is one of our most central phenomena in human language and we use it daily for a vast range of different purposes: for rejection, denial and for expressing non-existence. Negation is certainly one of the most multidimensional and complex units in language, semantically, cognitively and syntactically, as well as from a functional, pragmatic, perspective. Depending of the theoretical framework, sentence negation in particular has been identified as a modal operator, a truth-value operator, a rhetoric device, a figure of thought, a polarity item and a marker of linguistic polyphony and as a linguistic unit with a variety of discursive and contextual meanings. There remain, nevertheless, a large number of unsolved questions regarding negative forms of expressions and negative functions within specific languages, within different social settings and throughout the languages of the world. Thus, by bringing together scholars from different countries, with studies on different languages this volume aims to shed light and contribute to new knowledge about the forms and functionality of this universal phenomenon. Linguists and pragmaticiens generally agree that the use of negatives escapes logic and pure semantic description and is therefore best analysed with tools from cognitive and pragmatic theories. Similar themes connected to negatives approached from different perspectives and examined in different languages offer a contrastive reading that actually enlarges the spectra of new knowledge presented in the books’s chapters. Based on hypotheses within pragmatics and discourse analysis, the main assumption is here that forms of expressing negatives emerge and adjust constantly and in accordance with the cultural domain and the social setting of their appearance. This is why this volume focuses on the functions of negative expressions in specific domains and types of discourses.en_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStockholm Studies in Romance Languagesen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JH Sociology and anthropology::JHM Anthropologyen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics::CF Linguistics::CFG Semantics, discourse analysis, stylisticsen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics::CF Linguisticsen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JP Politics and government::JPA Political science and theoryen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JM Psychologyen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JH Sociology and anthropology::JHB Sociologyen_US
dc.subject.othersemantics; discourse analysis; pragmatics; political debates; argumentation; Negationen_US
dc.titleNegatives and Meaning: Social Setting and Pragmatic Effectsen_US
dc.title.alternativeUsing Negatives in Political Discourse, Social Media and Oral Interactionen_US
dc.typebook
oapen.identifier.doi10.16993/bcden_US
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy8137467e-e537-45b2-b1c8-94fc2574b729en_US
oapen.relation.isFundedByb494a75e-3801-4ae5-9d8e-794e82736426en_US
oapen.relation.isbn9789176352021en_US
oapen.relation.isbn9789176352045en_US
oapen.relation.isbn9789176352052en_US
oapen.series.number5en_US
oapen.pages287en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record