A Global Law of Diversity
Proposal review
Evolving Models and Concepts
dc.contributor.author | Alessi, Nicolò Paolo | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-31T14:52:14Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-10-31T14:52:14Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2025 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://0-library-oapen-org.catalogue.libraries.london.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12657/94145 | |
dc.description.abstract | This book provides a global perspective on the accommodation of diversity within constitutional traditions, considering the most innovative approaches and legal instruments of the Global North and Global South. This field of study, traditionally dominated by a Global North approach based on majority-minority and rights-based discourse, is undergoing significant development. The work thus assesses the appropriateness of the existing mainstream theoretical tools and concepts – in particular minority and minority-related concepts as well as rights discourse – to grasp the ongoing evolution of this field of law. A reconsideration of the traditional conceptual categories and the introduction of the concept “Law of Diversity” is proposed as a theoretical framework to grasp the ongoing developments in this area. Among the models studied, those that are referred to as emergent models for the accommodation of diversity in the Global North appear to be particularly in need of theoretical recognition. To this end, the theory of federalism is used to serve a rather unexplored theoretical function. Federal theory is put forward as a theoretical instrument to frame and explain the emergent instruments for the accommodation of diversity, as well as provide practical solutions for their development. The book will be of interest to researchers, academics, and policy-makers working in the areas of comparative constitutional law, minority and indigenous rights law, and federal studies. | en_US |
dc.language | English | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Routledge Advances in Minority Studies | en_US |
dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JH Sociology and anthropology::JHM Anthropology | en_US |
dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::L Law::LB International law::LBB Public international law::LBBR Public international law: human rights | en_US |
dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::L Law::LN Laws of specific jurisdictions and specific areas of law::LND Constitutional and administrative law: general | en_US |
dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::L Law::LA Jurisprudence and general issues::LAB Methods, theory and philosophy of law | en_US |
dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::L Law::LN Laws of specific jurisdictions and specific areas of law::LNT Social law and Medical law | en_US |
dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JP Politics and government | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Diversity accommodation;Minority;indigenous rights;Law of Diversity;Federalism;Comparative public law;Innovative theoretical framework | en_US |
dc.title | A Global Law of Diversity | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Evolving Models and Concepts | en_US |
dc.type | book | |
oapen.identifier.doi | 10.4324/9781003493518 | en_US |
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy | 7b3c7b10-5b1e-40b3-860e-c6dd5197f0bb | en_US |
oapen.relation.isFundedBy | 07f61e34-5b96-49f0-9860-c87dd8228f26 | en_US |
oapen.relation.isbn | 9781003493518 | en_US |
oapen.relation.isbn | 9781040258057 | en_US |
oapen.relation.isbn | 9781032795850 | en_US |
oapen.collection | Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) | en_US |
oapen.imprint | Routledge | en_US |
oapen.pages | 306 | en_US |
peerreview.anonymity | Single-anonymised | |
peerreview.id | bc80075c-96cc-4740-a9f3-a234bc2598f1 | |
peerreview.open.review | No | |
peerreview.publish.responsibility | Publisher | |
peerreview.review.stage | Pre-publication | |
peerreview.review.type | Proposal | |
peerreview.reviewer.type | Internal editor | |
peerreview.reviewer.type | External peer reviewer | |
peerreview.title | Proposal review | |
oapen.review.comments | Taylor & Francis open access titles are reviewed as a minimum at proposal stage by at least two external peer reviewers and an internal editor (additional reviews may be sought and additional content reviewed as required). |