Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHinrichs, Moiken
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-03T10:29:16Z
dc.date.available2025-02-03T10:29:16Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.urihttps://0-library-oapen-org.catalogue.libraries.london.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12657/98162
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the thesis was to provide a framework for the identification and analysis of individual craftspeople in bifacial flint production. Flint production flakes from replications of South Scandinavian Late Neolithic daggers and Early Bronze Age sickles were the focus of the study, in contrast to research so far, mostly relying on finished and often exceptional pieces. To identify technical traditions within technological systems and/or personal approaches to production, it is necessary to analyse the complete production process. Studies concerned with the process have mostly relied on typical and easy to identify production flakes. This facilitates the identification of tool manufacture and prevents mixing with other production processes, but it also prevents the actual identification of individual approaches to bifacial flint production. Typical flint flakes are typical because physical laws restrict the mode of possible removal. They are, by definition, strategic moments in the production process, which cannot be changed without altering the outcome, so everyone has to work the flint in more or less the same way. Personal or traditional approaches will not be found there, but in the small, flexible steps in between. This is what the volume presents. By detailed analysis of the working procedures of modern knappers, combined with statistical analysis of technical attributes on the production flakes, the possibilities for identification of differing approaches are explored. The analysis shows that the differences on personal or traditional levels are not to be found in the process of removal, but are more clearly distinguished in the preparation for removal. Likewise, the preferences for certain working techniques can be reconstructed and used to distinguish between knappers’ approaches. The results and the approach of the thesis can help us gain a clearer picture of local technical traditions of flint production. They also provide opportunities to identify and analyse processes of knowledge transmission and by this to reconstruct possible paths of learning, contacts between groups and the development and change of technological systems.en_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRootsen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NK Archaeologyen_US
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::3 Time period qualifiers::3B Prehistory::3BD Stone Ageen_US
dc.subject.otherprehistoric archaeology; neolithic; flint technology; bifacial production; chaîne opératoire; statistical analysis; daggers; sicklesen_US
dc.titleCraftful Mindsen_US
dc.title.alternativeTracing Technical Individuality in Production Processesen_US
dc.typebook
oapen.identifier.doi10.59641/t2780wfen_US
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy471fd6d5-f295-4fd0-a13a-e60a6420f603en_US
oapen.relation.isFundedBy631ac483-8bae-460f-9987-c3f4e4b98bb5en_US
oapen.relation.isbn9789464280814en_US
oapen.relation.isbn9789464280821en_US
oapen.imprintSidestone Press Dissertationsen_US
oapen.series.number7en_US
oapen.pages268en_US
oapen.place.publicationLeidenen_US
oapen.grant.number390870439
oapen.grant.programEXC 2150 ROOTS


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record